C-SFRAT, validata sense.ai, ContextQa, Lambda test intelligent, QMetry are used later in development and are reactive.
By the time you have this data, the project can already be late due to resource misallocation
Stop guessing and start using data to make informed decisions.
Just answer some questions about your software and how it's developed
Built from the world's largest defect density benchmarking study.
About the product, development practices and environment. The more you know the more accurate the prediction.
The defect density and risk level (percentile ranking) is predicted from the AI model
Escaped defects = defect density * effort (story points)
In angle world the software is never done. Requs.ai forecasts the defects for each program increment so you can spot technical debt pile up
Requs Ai has 6x data as Rome Laboratory TR-92-52 and 60,000x data of Musa prediction model
TR-92-52 and Musa models 40+ years old. The ancient models can't model effects of MBSE, Agile development, etc. on escaped defects
If you don't know an input, it's not considered in the prediction.
The more questions you answer (accurately) the better the confidence in the prediction
Requs AI Predicts covers the software failure rate, site reliability and error budget while Requs AI Software FMEA generates an effective software FMEA.
Dedicated or floating licenses. Yearly subscriptions or perpetual plans. Cloud or Desktop solution.
Feature tiers allow you to purchase only the features you need.
IEEE 1633
Requs AI runs on air gapped systems
Requs AI S has an API and open architecture.