MISSION READY | REQUS AI
Free Software Risk ConsultationSchedule a Software Walkthrough
Before the code is written

Predict Software Risk Before It Becomes an Expensive Failure.

Predict defects, RAM performance, reliability, availability, edge cases, and software failure modes—often before the first line of code is written.

Requs AI gives engineering organizations earlier visibility into the software risks that threaten mission success, safety, reliability, schedule, budget, and contractual performance. Instead of waiting for integration, testing, or field failures to expose problems, Requs AI helps teams identify risk during requirements, architecture, planning, and design—when there is still time to change the outcome.

See how Requs AI can be applied to your program in a personalized technical walkthrough.

PREDICTIVE ENGINEERING FLOWLIVE
INPUTS
Requirements
System Architecture
MBSE Models
Program Inputs
REQUS AI
DefectsRAMReliabilityEdge CasesFailure ModesSoftware FMEATest Strategy
BEFORE THE CODE IS WRITTEN.
BEFORE THE CODE IS WRITTEN
NO SOURCE CODE REQUIRED
MBSE READY
AIR-GAPPED DEPLOYMENT
MISSION-CRITICAL ENGINEERING
PROOF / RESEARCH

Turn Software Reliability from a Gamble into a Science.

Built on decades of software failure research.

Requs AI is powered by Mission Ready Software's extensive software-failure research and benchmarking—giving engineering teams a data-driven way to understand what drives reliable and available software.

679
FACTORS BENCHMARKED

Research includes a benchmarking study of 679 factors affecting reliable and available software.

40+
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Decades studying successful and failed software programs and the root causes behind software failure.

70%
START BEFORE CODING

Common Defect Enumeration research identifies pre-coding defect origins representing roughly 70% of defects in its root-cause analysis.

Find the risk while it is still a design decision.

UNDERSTAND EARLIERDECIDE EARLIERCORRECT EARLIER
THE CUSTOMER PROBLEM

Most Software Risk Is Discovered Too Late.

Today's systems are increasingly software-defined. At the same time, engineering organizations are being asked to deliver faster while meeting harder requirements.

Deliver faster
Meet demanding RAM requirements
Improve safety
Maintain high availability
Reduce defects
Control technical debt
Protect program schedules
Deliver against contractual commitments

Many critical software risks are not discovered until integration, testing, deployment, or operation. By then, the organization may already be dealing with:

01

Late Defect Discovery

Critical problems surface when correcting them is more expensive, disruptive, and time consuming.

02

Reliability & Availability Surprises

Programs discover too late that software may not achieve required reliability, uptime, or RAM objectives.

03

Hidden Edge Cases

Unexpected combinations of states, timing, sequences, sensor inputs, interfaces, and error conditions create unanticipated failures.

04

Software FMEA Bottlenecks

Traditional FMEA processes struggle to keep pace with Agile development and rapidly changing designs.

05

Schedule & Budget Pressure

Late rework consumes engineering resources, delays milestones, reduces margins, and threatens contractual performance.

Requs AI changes when engineering teams receive the information.

Don't wait for the failure to find the risk.

THE CORE DIFFERENTIATOR

Don't Just Shift Left. Start to the Left.

TRADITIONAL APPROACHCode → Testing → Failure Data → Analysis
REQUS AIRequirements → Architecture → Design → Prediction → Prevention
STEP 01

Describe the System

Provide characteristics such as:

System descriptionComponentsInterfacesStates & modesState transitionsSequencesTimingMission profileDevelopment practicesDesign controlsTest proceduresOptional MBSE models
STEP 02

Requs AI Identifies the Risk

Requs AI applies predictive models, benchmarking, software-failure research, and Common Defect Enumerations to determine which risks and failure patterns are most applicable to the system.

PREDICTIVE MODELS
BENCHMARKING DATA
FAILURE RESEARCH
COMMON DEFECT ENUMERATIONS
STEP 03

Your Engineering Team Acts

Improve requirements, architecture, design
Identify edge cases
Build better test cases
Improve fault tolerance
Predict RAM performance
Accelerate Software FMEA
Reduce wasteful development practices
Make better program decisions

Find the problem while it's still a design decision—not a field failure.

PRODUCT SUITE

One Platform. Multiple Views of Software Risk.

From quantitative predictions to hidden failure modes, Requs AI gives engineering teams actionable intelligence across the software lifecycle.

8 CAPABILITIES
PREDICT

Requs AI Predict

Know where the program is headed.

Defect densityTotal & escaped defectsDefect pileupProbability of late deliveryCustomer satisfaction indicators
Explore Requs AI Predict →
RAM PREDICTION

RAM Prediction

Know whether reliability targets are achievable.

Reliability & availabilityFailure ratesDowntimeMTBSFProbability of successExpected escaped failures
Explore RAM Prediction →
EDGE CASES

Edge Case Prediction

Find the failure scenarios nobody thought to test.

What could go wrongWhy it could happenHow to mitigate itHow to test for it
Explore Edge Case Prediction →
SOFTWARE FMEA

Software FMEA

Turn edge cases into actionable failure analysis.

Local & system effectsMission failuresSafety hazardsControls & mitigationsTest strategies
Explore Software FMEA →
OPTIMA

Requs AI Optima

Find a better path before the program runs off track.

Schedule & staffingTest intensityDefect densityDevelopment practicesFix rates & release cadence
Explore Requs AI Optima →
TREND

Requs AI Trend

Know when you've tested enough.

Forecast failures from active testing and determine how much additional testing and defect correction may be required to achieve reliability and availability objectives.

Explore Requs AI Trend →
CAUSALITY

Requs AI Causality

Turn Jira defect history into root-cause intelligence.

Use NLP and machine learning to analyze defect reports and categorize recurring root causes using Common Defect Enumerations.

Explore Requs AI Causality →
BLUEPRINT

Requs AI Blueprint

Start with industry-specific failure intelligence.

Accelerate Edge Case Prediction and Software FMEA with prepackaged edge cases, failure modes, test cases, and design controls tailored to your industry.

Explore Requs AI Blueprint →

Which Requs AI capability fits your program?

Tell us what you're developing, what reliability requirements you need to meet, and where you need greater visibility.

Request a Free Software Risk Consultation
ROLE-BASED VALUE

Built for the Teams Accountable for Mission Success.

See the trajectory before the program gets off course.

Program risk
Schedule exposure
Defect exposure
Technical debt
Development tradeoffs
High-ROI practices
Areas of unnecessary effort

Quantify software reliability earlier.

Failure rates
Availability
Downtime
Probability of mission success
Reliability performance
Whether RAM objectives can be achieved

Identify hidden software failure mechanisms.

Edge cases
Common root causes
Failure modes
Safety hazards
Controls
Mitigation strategies

Identify architectural risk before it becomes code.

Understand how system architecture, interfaces, states, modes, timing, sequences, and error handling may contribute to downstream failures.

Test what actually matters.

Edge-case testing
Fault-injection testing
Test coverage
Fault-tolerance testing
Test planning
Reliability-growth decisions
FEATURE SPOTLIGHT

Software FMEA Built for Software.

Software doesn't fail like hardware.

Software failures can emerge from combinations of states, modes, timing, sequences, data flow, interfaces, error handling, software transitions, hardware interaction, and human interaction. Traditional hardware-oriented FMEA methods may not adequately expose these software-specific root causes.

Requs AI's 6D CDE Software FMEA approach begins with Common Defect Enumerations and identifies the edge cases most relevant to the product—then connects those conditions to effects, mission failures, safety hazards, controls, and test strategy. The process supports MBSE integration and can generate outputs including critical-item and SSHA worksheets.

AI-Assisted Analysis

Requs AI identifies relevant edge cases and performs the heavy upfront analysis—current materials cite 67% of the work.

Agile Speed

Designed to align Software FMEA with Agile development cycles.

MBSE Integration

Use existing system-model information to strengthen and accelerate analysis.

Safety & Mission Focus

Connect software root causes to the hazards and mission impacts that matter.

See Requs AI Software FMEA in Action
6D CDE FMEA WORKFLOW
System / MBSE Model
Common Defect Enumerations
Product-Specific Edge Cases
Mitigations & Controls
Effects & Mission Failures
Hazards / SSHA
Test Strategy
SECURITY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Your Source Code Stays Yours.

Requs AI does not need to access or analyze your source code.

For aerospace, defense, government, energy, and other sensitive engineering environments, protecting proprietary information is critical. Requs AI can analyze the logical skeleton of the software system—the states, modes, sequences, timing dependencies, interfaces, data flow, and error-handling characteristics—without requiring customer source code or control algorithms.

NO SOURCE CODE REQUIRED

Your proprietary algorithms and code remain under your control.

CUSTOMER IP PROTECTION

Requs AI evaluates system characteristics rather than proprietary implementation.

ON-PREMISE DEPLOYMENT

Keep Requs AI inside the customer's controlled environment.

AIR-GAPPED SUPPORT

Deployment options for highly secure environments without normal internet connectivity.

MBSE READY

Integrate engineering model information into applicable Requs AI workflows.

Learn About Security & Deployment
RESEARCH / CREDIBILITY

Built on Decades of Understanding Why Software Fails.

Software reliability is our mission. Requs AI is the culmination of decades of software-failure analysis, reliability research, benchmarking, and experience with successful and failed software programs.

FAILURE ROOT-CAUSE INTELLIGENCEA deep database of software failures analyzed by root cause.
COMMON DEFECT ENUMERATIONSA systematic way to identify recurring defect patterns and which are relevant to a product.
MISSION-CRITICAL FOCUSSafety | Mission | Availability | Schedule | Cost | Revenue | Reputation
Smart connected city illustrating software risk assessment and software reliability prediction for mission-critical systems
IEEE STANDARDS ASSOCIATIONIEEE
IEEE Recommended
Practice on
Software Reliability
IEEE RELIABILITY SOCIETY
SPONSORED BY THE
STANDARDS COMMITTEE
IEEE
3 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
IEEE Std 1633™-2016
(Revision of IEEE Std 1633-2008)
STANDARDS LEADERSHIP

Chairperson of the IEEE 1633 Recommended Practices for Software Reliability

Our founder chaired the working group behind IEEE Std 1633—the recognized practice for predicting, measuring, and improving software reliability—and was awarded the 2017 IEEE Reliability Society Lifetime Achievement Award.

IEEE Std 1633™-20162017 RS Lifetime Achievement Award
Learn More
THE STORY BEHIND THE DATA

How the World’s Largest Database of Software Failures Was Created

1990s

Research Begins

Ann Marie pioneered a large-scale effort to identify overrated practices and undervalued practices to support fact-based decision-making.

2000s

Data Collection

Ann Marie benchmarked hundreds of development factors at hundreds of engineering companies against the key outcomes — escaped defect density, probability of on-time delivery, and margin of error on delivery schedule.

Jan 31, 2021

Countless Failures With Common Root Causes

By this point, Ann Marie had analyzed tens of thousands of defects by root cause. Surprisingly, all of them shrank down to only a few hundred unique causes. More importantly, she figured out how to spot these without digging through code.

2022

The First ML Defect Prediction Model

Decades of research culminated in Requs AI Predict in 2022, which predicts risk and defect density before the code is written. It has more data, factors, and accuracy than previous regression models.

2023

The First ML Edge Case/FMEA Tool

In 2023, Requs AI Edge Case Prediction and Software FMEA was deployed, which predicts edge cases before the code is written.

TRUSTED BY

Organizations we’ve helped mission-proof

LMLockheed Martin
Lockheed Martin logo
L3HL3 Harris
L3 Harris logo
GEGE Aerospace
GE Aerospace logo
JDJohn Deere
John Deere logo
LYFTLyft
Lyft logo
GDGeneral Dynamics
General Dynamics logo
BAEBAE Systems
BAE Systems logo
ELBElbit
Elbit logo
NASANASA
NASA logo
MSFCNASA Marshall Space Flight Center
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center logo
JSCNASA Johnson Space Flight Center
NASA Johnson Space Flight Center logo
KSCNASA Kennedy Space Flight Center
NASA Kennedy Space Flight Center logo
JPLNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory logo
BABoeing
Boeing logo
PHPhilips
Philips logo
ABTAbbott
Abbott logo
AMApplied Materials
Applied Materials logo
WABWabtec
Wabtec logo
MEDMedtronic
Medtronic logo
SKStryker
Stryker logo
HALHalliburton
Halliburton logo
RTXRaytheon
Raytheon logo
USAUS Army
US Army logo
AMCOMUS Army Aviation and Missile Command
US Army Aviation and Missile Command logo
PEOUS Army PEO Soldier
US Army PEO Soldier logo
GVSUS Army Ground Vehicle Systems
US Army Ground Vehicle Systems logo
SIESiemens
Siemens logo
NAVAIRUS Navy NAVAIR
US Navy NAVAIR logo
NGNorthrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman logo
STANDARDS & GUIDANCE

Grounded in Recognized Software Reliability & Safety Standards.

Requs AI is built on the same frameworks practitioners use to analyze, predict, and mitigate software failure. Explore the standards and guidance documents that inform our approach.

AIAG-VDA Software FMEA

Practitioner extension of the AIAG-VDA FMEA handbook applied to software.

Read Standard →

IEC 61508-7

Software FMEA guidance for functional safety and IEC 61508 compliance.

Read Standard →

IEC 61508 Part 3

Software requirements for safety-related systems and FMEA integration.

Read Standard →

ISO 26262 Part 6

Automotive software safety and FMEA alignment for road vehicles.

Read Standard →

JSSSEH Appendix E

Joint Software Systems Safety Engineering Handbook generic safety requirements.

Read Standard →

NATO AOP-52

Generic software safety design requirements for defence systems.

Read Standard →

SAE ARP5580

Software FMECA recommended practice for aerospace and complex systems.

Read Standard →

IEEE 1633

Recommended practice on software reliability and prediction methods.

Read Standard →

NASA-STD-8719.13

Where software FMEA fits within NASA software safety standards.

Read Standard →

NASA-STD-8739.8

Software assurance and FMEA alignment for NASA programs.

Read Standard →

SAE1025 FMEA Section 7

SwFMEA section of the SAE1025 FMEA handbook for systems engineering.

Read Standard →

Software Reliability Standards Index

An index of standards, handbooks, and guidance documents for software reliability.

Read Index →
INDUSTRIES

When Software Failure Isn't an Option.

IMAGE — AEROSPACE SYSTEM

Aerospace & Defense

Identify software risk earlier to protect mission capability, program milestones, system reliability, availability, and sustainment objectives.

Explore Aerospace & Defense →
IMAGE — DEFENSE / DoD PROGRAM

Government & DoD

Support mission-critical software programs with predictive reliability, RAM, system safety, defect, and failure-mode intelligence.

Explore Government & DoD →
IMAGE — SATELLITE

Space & Satellite

Identify hidden software risks and reliability issues before they threaten mission availability or mission success.

Explore Space & Satellite →
IMAGE — AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE

Automotive & Autonomous Systems

Identify edge cases, software failure modes, and safety risks earlier in the development lifecycle.

Explore Automotive →
IMAGE — GRID / ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE

Energy & Critical Infrastructure

Improve software reliability and availability for systems where downtime creates significant operational, safety, or financial consequences.

Explore Energy →
IMAGE — INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT

Industrial & Manufacturing

Reduce software-driven downtime, identify failure mechanisms earlier, and strengthen the reliability of software-intensive equipment.

Explore Industrial →
OVERVIEW VIDEO

See What Requs AI Finds Before Your Software Fails.

Predict Earlier. Prevent More. Be Mission Ready.

Schedule a Software Walkthrough
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Software Reliability Prediction & Software FMEA, Answered

What is software reliability prediction?

Software reliability prediction estimates how many defects a release will contain, when they will be found, and how they affect availability — before the code is written. Requs AI applies IEEE 1633 prediction models to your requirements, process data and development practices to produce defect counts, a defect discovery profile and RAM figures early enough to change the outcome.

How is Software FMEA different from hardware FMEA?

Software FMEA analyses failure modes caused by requirements, logic, data, timing, states and interfaces — not physical wear-out. Requs AI uses the Common Defect Enumeration (CDE) and the 6D CDE process aligned with IEEE 1633 and SAE J1025, so software failure modes are enumerated systematically instead of brainstormed.

Which standards does Requs AI support?

IEEE 1633 (Recommended Practice for Software Reliability) and SAE J1025 (software FMEA), plus reliability program expectations in safety and mission standards — including software fault tree analysis, software allocation in the system reliability model, and software failures in FRACAS.

Can software defects really be predicted before coding starts?

Yes. Defect density and failure modes correlate strongly with measurable program characteristics: requirements quality, staffing, process maturity, complexity and test strategy. Requs AI scores those inputs against decades of industry failure data to predict defect counts, edge cases and reliability growth before the first line of code.

What are edge cases, and why do they cause field failures?

Edge cases are the inputs, states, timings and sequences at the boundary of what a system was designed to handle. Most escaped field failures trace back to edge cases never enumerated in requirements or tests. Requs AI identifies the most common edge cases by function type so they can be designed for and verified.

Who uses Requs AI?

Reliability engineers, systems engineers, software leads, quality managers and program managers across aerospace, defense, medical devices, automotive, energy and industrial manufacturing — wherever software failure carries safety, mission or warranty cost.

BUSINESS OUTCOME

Earlier Visibility Creates Better Decisions.

01
See Risk Earlier
02
Make Better Engineering Decisions
03
Reduce Late-Stage Rework
04
Protect Schedule & Budget
05
Improve Reliability & Availability
06
Protect Mission Success

The earlier engineering teams understand software risk, the more options they have to change the outcome.

STAY AHEAD OF SOFTWARE RISK

Join the Mission Ready Software Newsletter

Practical insights on software reliability, RAM, defect prevention, edge cases, Software FMEA, system safety, and mission-critical software engineering—plus product updates, webinars, technical resources, and industry news.

No spam. Just relevant insights for engineering, reliability, safety, and software leaders.

RELIABILITY FORECAST
Predicted defect density0.42 / KSLOC
Availability99.4%
Edge cases exposed312
FMEA effort automated67%
ILLUSTRATIVE OUTPUT — REQUS AI

What Could Requs AI Identify in Your Software Program?

Tell us what you're building, where reliability matters, and what you're trying to predict. We'll show you how Requs AI can help your team identify software risk, predict defects and RAM performance, uncover edge cases, strengthen Software FMEA, and make better decisions earlier in development.

Schedule a Software WalkthroughRequest a Free Software Risk Consultation

A focused conversation around your program. No generic sales presentation.