Schedule a Software Walkthrough
DOW-Aligned Software Reliability

Expert-driven compliance for software-intensive defense programs.

Streamline your Reliable Software SOW adherence using the methodologies authored by the Chair of the IEEE 1633 working group.

IEEE 1633
Chaired Working Group from 2012 to 2026
SAE 1025 §7
Authored 6D CDE methodology found in clause 7
CDE Common Defect Enumeration
Taxonomy originated & adopted DOW-wide
01 — Authority

The reliable software resource and standards were written here first.

Standards Body

IEEE 1633 Leadership

Chair of the 2026 IEEE 1633 working group — the governing standard for software reliability engineering.

Defense Contracting

Defense Standards Architect

Contributed to the DoW Reliable Software SOW and Section 7 of SAE 1025.

World's largest reliable software benchmarking study of it's kind

Software Failure Data

This fuels first machine learning model to predict software reliability before the code is written

World's largest database of software failures analyzed by root cause

CDE Taxonomy inventor

From it, we created the Common Defect Enumeration, the primary taxonomy currently adopted and cited across DOW technical frameworks.

02 — Products

Most tools mimic compliance. This one generates it.

Because the SOW clauses, the SAE 1025 FMEA standards, and the Common Defect Enumeration originated from our research and data, Requs AI doesn't just align with these requirements — it is the physical manifestation of them.

When your team uses Requs AI, they're utilizing the exact logic the Department of War expects to see in your contract deliverables.

Requirement
Requs AI Solution
Outcome
Software reliability predictions as per IEEE 1633
Requs AI Predict, Requs AI Optima
Automated reliability prediction, sensitivity analysis & reporting
Software reliability risk assessment
Requs AI Risk ID
Identifies risk early. Benchmarks defect density.
SAE 1025 FMEA §7
Requs AI Software FMEA and Requs AI Blueprint
Pre-configured FMEA report generation
Edge Case Mitigation
Requs AI Edge Case
Uncovers the hidden edge cases and how to test for them
Add Software to FRACAS and Software Reliability Evaluation
Requs AI Trend
Fact based materiel release decisions
Why Requs AI

Built for efficiency and compliance.

01 — REPORTING

Automated Reporting

Stop manually formatting compliance reports. Requs AI tools are architected to generate the specific deliverables required by Department of War contracts automatically.

02 — WORKFLOW

Built-in Best Practices

Your software development lifecycle is pre-aligned with industry standards the moment you begin using our tools.

03 — REVIEW

Traceability

Maintain full documentation integrity, from initial SOW commitment to final project verification.

03 — Services

Engagements, structured like the standards they satisfy.

§1Advisory

SOW Compliance Review

Focus

A comprehensive evaluation of your current Statement of Work to identify exact software reliability obligations, verification criteria, and reporting requirements.

Deliverable

A tailored gap-analysis report aligning your technical proposal or active contract directly with IEEE 1633, SAE 1025, and CDE requirements.

§2Training

Advanced Engineering Bootcamps

Focus

Intensive training modules combining practical reliability engineering with formal compliance methodologies — including the flagship curriculum covering IEEE 1633 implementation and SAE 1025 FMEA execution.

Deliverable

Practical, hands-on instruction delivered virtually or on-site, empowering your engineering teams to independently manage reliability growth and safety hazard analysis.

§3Consulting

Custom FMEA & Reliability Modeling Consulting

Focus

Specialized engineering support for complex, safety-critical software architectures across aerospace, defense, and autonomous systems.

Deliverable

Expert facilitation of software failure mode and effects analyses, backed by the native Common Defect Enumeration data framework.

Bring your program into alignment.

Start with a Compliance Review — a direct read on where your SOW stands against IEEE 1633, SAE 1025, and CDE.